Prosecutor, court commissioner vie for Benton-Franklin judge. Here’s our pick | Editorial

Both candidates in the race for Benton-Franklin Superior Court Judge, Position 5, bring impressive qualifications, but Bronson Brown’s experience and endorsements make him the superior choice.

This seat was formerly held by Judge Sam Swanberg, who stepped down earlier this year amid allegations of abusive behavior toward his ex-wife and harassment of a former girlfriend. His successor must act with the integrity and professional conduct crucial to rebuilding public confidence in the Superior Court.

Brown currently serves as a Superior Court commissioner, essentially performing most duties of a judge short of sentencings. This direct judicial experience, coupled with strong endorsements from sitting judges — including all of the current bench — and the local bar association, makes him exceptionally well-prepared for the role.

His background as general counsel for multiple school districts and his community service further demonstrates a commitment to public service and deep roots in the community.

The other candidate, Shawn Sant, is the current elected Franklin County prosecutor. He offers a different but respectable background. With 26 years of experience spanning roles as a prosecutor, public defender and police officer, Sant brings a holistic perspective to the bench. His support for therapeutic courts and diversion programs shows an understanding of innovative approaches to reduce recidivism and costs.

Both candidates emphasize their commitment to interpreting laws as written rather than legislating from the bench – a crucial stance for maintaining the integrity of the judicial system. They also both demonstrate a nuanced understanding of the challenges facing the courts, from case backlogs to the need for fairness and compassion.

We commend Sant for his service and encourage him to continue pursuing his judicial aspirations. His experience and perspective would be valuable on the bench in the future, but Brown’s judicial experience, community ties, and strong support from the legal community give him the advantage in this race.

About the Editorial Board

The Tri-City Herald editorial board is comprised of experienced opinion journalists and community members, and is separate from The Herald’s newsroom. Conversations are on the record.

What does the recommendation process entail?

Whenever possible, The Herald editorial board meets with opposing candidates at the same time. The questions are largely focused on a candidate’s qualifications and goals. The editorial board then discusses the candidates in each race and decides who to recommend. Board members seek to reach a consensus on our recommendations, but not every decision is unanimous.

Is the editorial board partisan?

No. In making recommendations, members of the editorial board consider which candidates are well prepared to represent their constituents — not whether they agree with us or belong to a particular political party. We evaluate candidates’ relevant experience, their readiness for office, their depth of knowledge of key issues, their understanding of public policy and their ability to work with the current board . We’re seeking candidates who are thoughtful and who offer more than just party-line talking points. The editorial board will endorse both Republicans and Democrats.

Why are the editorials unsigned?

Our election recommendations reflect the collective views of The Herald’s editorial board — not just the opinion of one writer. For the 2024 election, the board includes: Laurie Williams, Herald executive editor; Jack Briggs, retired Herald publisher; Ken Robertson, retired Herald executive editor; Rosa Torres, community representative. Chris Trejbal is our editorial writer.

This story was originally published October 22, 2024 at 12:30 PM.