Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Letters to the Editor

Letter: Columbia River shoreline should not be returned to local control

Some Tri-Citians are hoping to convince Congress and the Army Corps of Engineers to return control of the Columbia River shoreline to local governments.
Some Tri-Citians are hoping to convince Congress and the Army Corps of Engineers to return control of the Columbia River shoreline to local governments. Tri-City Herald

Recent articles in the Tri-City Herald state that local officials are advocating that Congress transfer control of the Columbia River shoreline from the Army Corps of Engineers to local control. I am strongly opposed to this proposal.

The Army Corps of Engineers has a history of wise and conservative management to benefit both wildlife and public use. This is well demonstrated by Bateman Island, a city park (owned by the Corps) located on the Columbia River as well as Columbia Park and a number of other wildlife areas, and parks along the Snake and Columbia rivers.

For an example of what happens when there is political control, look to Sacajawea Park, which is mostly underutilized now that the state Legislature has levied a regressive tax in the form of a $10 day use fee. This fee has eliminated most of the Hispanic families that were major users of this park in the recent past and in my view represents an example of using a public resource to raise money at the expense of the public benefit. Essentially this fee denies use of what was a public commons to lower-income people.

Stan Moon, Richland

This story was originally published May 8, 2016 at 3:03 AM with the headline "Letter: Columbia River shoreline should not be returned to local control."

Get one year of unlimited digital access for $159.99
#ReadLocal

Only 44¢ per day

SUBSCRIBE NOW