One big item in Republican tax plans would make figuring out our individual income taxes a little less crazy. But it comes at a price.
So here’s a basic question millions of Americans may soon face, one that highlights the link between behavior and money:
Will we donate less to charities if it’s harder to get a tax break for doing so?
Nonprofit leaders are nervous. In fact, they fear they might lose billions of dollars in donations.
Never miss a local story.
Because while the deductions for charitable contributions won’t go away, they (and some others such as a deduction for mortgage interest) would become way less relevant under the GOP tax plans.
“They are keeping these deductions in name, but they are effectively going away for lots of folks,” said Gregg Polsky, a University of Georgia professor whose focuses include tax law.
Initial proposals in both the House and Senate would nearly double the allowed standard deduction (from $6,350 to about $12,000 for singles, and from $12,700 to about $24,000 for married couples filing jointly).
On the surface, this sounds like the government just gave us our wallets back.
In reality it’s a bit more complicated than that, though it looks like most people will end up paying less in taxes. (Avert your eyes from this line if you don’t like headaches: While increasing the standard deduction, the proposals eliminate personal exemptions of $4,050 per person, but also boost child tax credits and offer temporary new credits, but also mess with or eliminate other deductions.)
For this piece, I endured reading much of the gazillion-page tax proposals.
Then I did some math. Taxes for my family would have been about $250 lower had the House’s proposed plan been in place last year.
One big deduction or many little ones
Every year, tens of millions of individual U.S. taxpayers have to decide whether it’s a better deal to take the standard deduction or to itemize deductions for things like charitable donations, home mortgage interest, state income taxes, real estate taxes, car taxes and medical expenses.
Itemizing adds more complexity and time to what’s already a grueling process. But if it can save you hundreds or thousands of dollars, it’s worth it for lots of people.
Nearly one in three people who file taxes itemize now. That could plummet to one in 20 if Congress essentially doubles the standard deduction as proposed, according to Richard Schmalbeck, a Duke University law professor who specializes in tax issues.
People who don’t itemize no longer have a tax incentive to give to charities.
Here’s why that’s a big deal, using some math from wonks at the Tax Policy Center: Someone with a tax rate that goes as high as 28 percent could give a $100 donation to a charity, but they’d see a $28 drop in taxes with the deduction. Which means that $100 donation ultimately only cost them $72.
I got in touch with Habitat for Humanity International, a pretty wonderful organization that does good by helping people get homes of their own.
“Habitat for Humanity has serious concerns about the proposed tax bill’s impact on charitable giving,” Chris Vincent, a vice president for the organization, said in a statement emailed to me. “Habitat strongly urges Congress to preserve and enhance charitable giving incentives, to preserve the vital work that organizations like Habitat do with low-income families across the country.”
Our tax code works like an alarm clock for generosity. It rouses us and encourages us to donate now, before the end of the tax year or, if you’re rich, before you die, rather than procrastinating until who knows when.
Try visiting a Salvation Army or Goodwill drop-off in the last few days of the year.
Some centers hire police officers to manage the crush of people trying to donate items in time to claim them on their next income tax forms.
“New Year’s Eve is that magical time in the financial year when we Americans become incredibly charitable, in part because we are a little greedy,” I wrote in a past column. “Isn’t it beautiful when self-interest collides with societal interest?”
Keep in mind that the federal tax code is rife with exceptions and loopholes that help out some and not others. The tax proposals don’t come close to fully reforming the system.
Matt Kempner writes for The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org.