Instead of buying surveillance equipment, animal shelters should spend the money on taking care of the animals that get left at the shelter.
Careless and ignorant pet owners will not be held accountable with the installation of cameras because they will only find another place to dump their animals, and the animals will be the ones to endure more suffering because they will likely be left in places with no one around to intervene.
I am reluctant to attribute the condition of an abused animal to malicious intent from the abandoner. Who is to say that this is the person who actually abused or neglected the animal? I will admit that it is unlikely the person dropping off the animal is an innocent Good Samaritan; however, it is a possibility.
We would not want to discourage any future Good Samaritans from helping a suffering animal. Use the money for the animals; the unintended consequences of installing cameras would be greater than any benefit from catching and (theoretically) holding accountable any animal abandoner.
CASEY DAVIS, Benton City