In 1993, we purchased a lot in the doughnut hole, knowing that the area had been designated a part of the city of Pasco growth area. If one did not discover this during pre-purchase considerations, who is responsible?
We also knew that to get water, we would be required to give a power of attorney to the city of Pasco regarding annexation. Considering alternatives, this seemed a reasonable consideration even though the covenant on the property continued to bind any future owners. If one did not discover this before purchase, or if the title insurance was not examined for exclusions, who is responsible?
I do have a modicum of sympathy for those who owned property in this area prior to the Urban Growth Area designation and objected to Franklin County commissioners. But lawful change occurs.
For the others, you can't have your cake and eat it too. Sometimes, the only alternative is to move on.
Never miss a local story.
MELVIN FOSTER, Pasco