In 1993, a religious group called the Branch Davidians of Waco Texas was attacked by the U.S. government (President Bill Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno) without due process. Eighty-six American citizens, 24 of them children, died.
Reno was never charged, but there was certainly sufficient evidence to warrant an indictment. Unfortunately, we did not have Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., then.
Recently, the current attorney general says that it is all right and could happen without due process that a military drone could take out a suspected terrorist within the United States.
I am as far as you can get in looks and actions, from a terrorist, but what if the suspect looks like me? Without due process, the government could take me out with a military drone.
In that case, would I not be justified in mounting a .50-caliber "assault" weapon on my pickup to defend myself? That may be against the law but not against the Constitution. The drone is against both.
That is a good example of why we have the Second Amendment.
JIM BOAK, Richland