Kennewick Man Virual Interpretive CenterKennewick Man Virual Interpretive Center
Legal Documents
Published Thursday, Jun. 12, 2003

One Hundred First Congress of the United States of America

Published Tuesday, Jun. 03, 2003

I. INTRODUCTION

Published Tuesday, Apr. 11, 2000

FPMcManamon

Published Thursday, Dec. 10, 1998

Plaintiffs submit the following report to advise the Court of events relating to the skeleton's transfer to the Burke Museum.

Published Monday, Dec. 07, 1998

Report of the Inventory of the Kennewick Skeleton

Published Thursday, Oct. 29, 1998

Burke Museum Entrance Inventory, Oct. 29, 1998, Beth Walton

Published Wednesday, Oct. 28, 1998

Report on the Condition of the Kennewick Man Skeleton on October 28, 1998 by James C. Chatters, Ph.D.

Published Wednesday, Jul. 01, 1998

II. DEFENDANTS' CULTURAL AFFILIATION DETERMINATION VIOLATED THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT.

Published Wednesday, Jul. 01, 1998

VIII. DEFENDANTS VIOLATED THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT.

Published Wednesday, Jul. 01, 1998

Time-Line For Transfer and Examination of Remains, by Interior Department archaeologist Francis McManamon

Published Wednesday, Jul. 01, 1998

I. DEFENDANTS HAVE NOT SHOWN THAT THEIR 1492 RULE IS PROPER.

Published Wednesday, Jul. 01, 1998

PLAINTIFFS' REPLY MEMORANDUM

Published Wednesday, Jul. 01, 1998

VI. DEFENDANTS VIOLATED NHPA .

Published Wednesday, Jul. 01, 1998

The federal defendants submit their Fourth Quarterly Status Report in the above-styled matter. This Status Report is being submitted in compliance with the Court's Order of June 27, 1997.

Published Wednesday, Jul. 01, 1998

IX. A SECOND REMAND TO DEFENDANTS WOULD NOT BE APPROPRIATE.

Published Wednesday, Jul. 01, 1998

VII. DEFENDANTS' CURATION ARGUMENTS ARE NOT CREDIBLE.

Published Wednesday, Jul. 01, 1998

III. DEFENDANTS' REPATRIATION TO A COALITION VIOLATES THE STATUTE.

Published Wednesday, Jul. 01, 1998

IV. DEFENDANTS' USE OF INFORMAL ADJUDICATION WAS IMPROPER AND CONTRARY TO THE COURT'S ORDER.

Published Wednesday, Jul. 01, 1998

V. DEFENDANTS' FIRST AMENDMENT ARGUMENTS MISSTATE THE LAW AND FACTS.

Published Wednesday, Jun. 10, 1998

Mr. Chairman, the American Association of Physical Anthropologists (AAPA) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the amendments Rep. Hastings has introduced to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA).

Published Wednesday, Jun. 10, 1998

Mr. Chairman, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation of Oregon strongly objects to H.R. 2893, to amend the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). This bill, if enacted, would make a mockery of NAGPRA. Instead of assuring the return of our ancestors and cultural items to us, H.R. 2893 would twist NAGPRA into a law that virtually guarantees that items of Native American heritage be handed over to scientists, perhaps in perpetuity, for whatever study they may choose. This result directly conflicts with Congress' intent in enacting NAGPRA just 8 years ago.

Published Wednesday, Jun. 10, 1998

HOUSE RESOURCES COMMITTEE

Published Wednesday, Jun. 10, 1998

I. Introduction

Published Wednesday, Jun. 10, 1998

Mr. Chairman,

Published Wednesday, Jun. 10, 1998

Mr. Chairman, the Society for American Archaeology (SAA) and the Society for Historical Archaeology (SHA) are grateful for the opportunity to comment on H.R. 2893, amendments to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) introduced by Representative Hastings.

Published Wednesday, Jun. 10, 1998

Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, I want to thank your for the opportunity to speak to you on behalf of an ammendment to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act.

Published Wednesday, Jun. 10, 1998

Statement of Katherine H. Stevenson, Associate Director, Cultural Resource Stewardship and Partnerships, National Park Service, Department of the InteriorPhillip L. Walker, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara for the American Association of Physical Anthropologists

Published Tuesday, May. 26, 1998

Notice to the court by Interior Department archaeologist Francis P. McManamon on May 26, 1998.

Published Wednesday, May. 13, 1998

Magistrate Judge Jelderks, May 13, 1998:

Published Tuesday, May. 12, 1998

Draft (Note: This is the version distributed and discussed with tribal representatives on 12 May 1998 at the COE District Office Building in Walla Walla, WA. FPM 14May1998)

Published Thursday, Apr. 16, 1998

II. THE CULTURAL AFFILIATION DETERMINATION MUST BE VACATED.

Published Thursday, Apr. 16, 1998

IV. DEFENDANTS VIOLATED THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE.

Published Thursday, Apr. 16, 1998

V. DEFENDANTS IMPROPERLY PREVENTED STUDY BY PLAINTIFFS.

Published Thursday, Apr. 16, 1998

VIII. DEFENDANTS VIOLATED FOIA TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION.

Published Thursday, Apr. 16, 1998

INTRODUCTION

Published Thursday, Apr. 16, 1998

TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS FOR CITED REFERENCES

Published Thursday, Apr. 16, 1998

VI. THE SITE COVER-UP VIOLATED NHPA AND DESTROYED EVIDENCE.

Published Thursday, Apr. 16, 1998

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO VACATE SECOND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION

Published Thursday, Apr. 16, 1998

III. DEFENDANTS VIOLATED THE APA AND DUE PROCESS GUARANTEES.

Published Thursday, Apr. 16, 1998

IX. THE COURT SHOULD AVOID THE FUTILITY OF ANOTHER REMAND.

Published Thursday, Apr. 16, 1998

VII. DEFENDANTS HAVE NOT PROPERLY CURATED THE SKELETON.

Published Friday, Mar. 27, 1998

105th CONGRESS

Published Friday, Jan. 02, 1998

A. Plaintiffs' efforts to participate in the administrative process.

Published Monday, Dec. 29, 1997

Letter from Alan L. Schneider, scientists attorney, to federal lawyer Linda Kirts on Dec. 29, 1997:

Published Tuesday, Dec. 23, 1997

This letter was written Dec. 23, 1997 by Francis P. McManamon, head of the Interior Department's efforts to investigate Kennewick Man.


Member Options