'); } -->
Voice of the Mid-Columbia | Kennewick, Pasco and Richland, Wash. |
I-1033 brings back successful policies passed by the voters previously. In 1993, during tough economic times, voters approved Initiative 601 which put reasonable limits on government's fiscal policies. I-601 established a sustainable rate for government to grow, saying it could grow at the inflation rate plus population growth with faster growth requiring voter approval.
And I-601 worked very well for 12 years (1993-2005) when Gregoire and the Democrats got rid of that growth limit. Removing I-601's reasonable fiscal discipline and policies resulted directly in a massive deficit ($9 billion).
Repealing I-601's limit in 2005 allowed them to take their budget on a fiscal roller coaster, overextending themselves in good times - creating unsustainable budgets - which inevitably made the bad times even worse. I-1033 gets us off that fiscal roller coaster by re-establishing I-601's same reasonable allowance for growth while permitting higher increases with voter approval.
I-601 worked and it can work again with the passage of I-1033.
So what happens to excess tax revenues that government collects above I-1033's limit? First, a fixed percentage of tax revenue is transferred into the constitutionally-protected rainy day fund. Beyond that, the remainder of excess tax revenues gets refunded back to taxpayers via lower property taxes. Under I-1033, everyone's property taxes will be reduced. Struggling working families and fixed-income senior citizens desperately need relief from our state's crushing property tax burden. Washington shouldn't be a state where only rich people can afford a home. I-1033 provides needed, long-overdue property tax relief.
Putting a reasonable limit on the growth of government, like I-601 previously did, gives politicians the excuse to say no to the special interest groups and encourages them to finally start prioritizing and reforming government.
Opponents have no alternative to I-1033 to lower property taxes. Opponents have no alternative to I-1033 to get government off the fiscal roller coaster. Opponents want us to trust the politicians, despite their insatiable appetite for higher taxes. Opponents ignore the 16 years of positive history with Initiative 601 in Washington state, preferring instead to talk about different tax limits in California, Colorado and other states. Opponents are against I-1033 because it allows the people, and not the politicians, to decide how fast the government should grow and how big a tax burden we can afford.
Opponents know that Washington's 12 years under I-601 worked and that's why they want to get everyone to look at other states. But other states have totally different proposals and policies that are unique to them.
Washington state has its own experience with I-601 - 12 years with it, four years without it. Again, what happened without I-601's fiscal discipline? A fiscal roller coaster ending with a $9 billion deficit. I-1033 makes sure that doesn't happen again.
Opponents want higher taxes and a state income tax. Opponents are against ANY limit on government's power to take as much as they want from the taxpayers.
Forbes magazine and the Tax Foundation rank Washington as the 8th-highest-taxed state in the nation.I-1033 keeps us from hitting No. 1.
Property taxes keep going higher and higher and government keeps getting bigger and bigger. The people are losing control. I-1033 allows the state, counties and cities to grow, but at a rate that citizens can control and taxpayers can afford. I-1033 gets government off the fiscal roller coaster, allowing it to grow at a sustainable rate that doesn't outpace taxpayers' ability to afford it.
I-1033 is needed now more than ever.
w Tim Eyman is co-sponsor ofI-1033 and heads up Voters Want More Choices, a grass-roots taxpayer protection organization, www.VotersWantMoreChoices.com.
@Nyx.CommentBody@