Letter: Costly energy

June 24, 2014 

Regarding the windmills littering our landscape. Contrary to a recent letter ("Wind energy's benefits," June 16), they are not reliable but high maintenance and not affordable -- federal taxpayers subsidize half their rates and wind is still more expensive than hydro.

Wind advocates claim 650,000 homes are currently powered by wind in Washington. That's absolutely false. That's "green-energy math." In truth, we have 3,075 megawatts of wind power, but the turbines only produce one third of their rated power and only 5 percent during peak load. (When it's needed.)

All the windmills in Washington combined produce enough electricity to power only 35,300 households at peak load. That's all we get for our $5.3 billion spent. To claim wind is the energy of the future is like claiming Columbus' Pinta and Santa Maria are the ships of the future. The public is being misled by windmill supporters so as to not support the state Legislature from defining hydro power as "renewable." Because if hydro power is a renewable, your electric rates must, by law, be reduced. If you don't believe hydro is renewable, then your rates must, by law, be increased.

So ask yourself, is hydro renewable? Because it's your money they're throwing into the wind.


Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service