Letter: Railroad crossing on Gage

June 21, 2014 

I recently read in the Herald about the conflict between the cities wanting to connect shopping areas off Gage Boulevard and the Tri-Cities Railroad Co. opposing the proposal. Both sides seem to be fighting for a lose-lose position.

The best solution is to have a nonimpact railroad crossing, either bridge over or tunnel underneath the existing tracks. It's understandable that the costs are more significant and prohibitive. But if the past is any indication of the future, the railroad and the Tri-Cities will continue to grow. Any plan should support future growth and the best win-win solution is to have a nonimpact crossing.

Obviously, some will say the cost of this is extremely prohibitive. But how important is that connection. It seems fairly important to me. If the area, below Columbia Center is expected to have good growth, it really needs that connection with the shoppers. Those numbers weren't in the article, so the public isn't privy to data that could give solid opinions about the merits one way of the other.

With the community's experience in Kennewick and its impacted crossings, efforts should be made to have a nonimpact crossing.

MARK NAULTY, West Richland

Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service