Letter: Richland's pot ban illogical

March 10, 2014 

One of the arguments for continuing Richland's marijuana moratorium is that county residents voted against the recreational marijuana initiative. But the county also recently voted to put hard liquor in all of our grocery stores, so it's hard to argue that residents are very concerned about public safety.

Alcohol is far more dangerous than marijuana, and it makes no sense to have a huge increase in the number of stores that can sell hard liquor and at the same time outlaw a couple of marijuana stores.

If the Richland City Council thinks it is now their job, in the interest of public safety, to outlaw the sale of marijuana, then should they not apply the same safety criteria to the sale of tobacco and liquor?


Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service