UPDATE: PNNL, Grant County passed over for drone testing

Herald staff and Associated PressDecember 30, 2013 

The Federal Aviation Administration announced six sites selected for testing drones Monday, but a Grant County site to be managed by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland was not among them.

Alaska, Nevada, New York, North Dakota, Texas and Virginia will host the research sites, providing diverse climates, geography and air traffic environments, FAA Administrator Michael Huerta said.

The Alaska research site plans to use the Pendleton airport for some of its commercial drone testing, according to the East Oregonian.

Innovate Washington, a state agency, had proposed that the Grant County International Airport in Moses Lake be used as a flight center to advance the use of nonmilitary unmanned aircraft, with the cooperation of PNNL and 10 other state, county and private industry partners.

The Grant County airport, once known as Larson Air Force Base, has one of the largest airfields in the United States and a runway 13,500 feet long. But it is underused, making it a potentially safe place to test unmanned aircraft.

PNNL had been proposed to operate the center because of its research reputation, its strong safety record and its experience managing "user" facilities. The planned unmanned aircraft centers are considered user facilities because industry researchers and federal, state and local governments would pay a fee to use it.

Washington had not received information Monday on where its proposal failed, said Alex Pietsch of the Washington state Office of Aerospace.

But it will be looking for opportunities to form partnerships with the drone test centers that were picked, he said.

The state still stands to gain from the unmanned aircraft industry, both in economic activity and job creation, based on its combination of aerospace industry and research institutions, he said.

Washington follows only California in the potential for job creation and additional revenue for the new industry, according to a 2013 economic report produced by the Associate for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International. The report predicts that the growth of unmanned aircraft could create more than 100,000 jobs in the United States between 2015 and 2025, with almost 10,000 of them in Washington.

Drones have been mainly used by the military, but governments, businesses, farmers and others are making plans to join the market. Many universities are starting or expanding drone programs.

The FAA does not currently allow commercial use of drones, but it is working to develop operational guidelines by the end of 2015, although officials concede the project may take longer than expected.

The FAA projects some 7,500 commercial drones could be aloft within five years of getting widespread access to American airspace.

Representatives from winning states were jubilant about the FAA announcement and the likelihood that the testing will draw companies interested in cashing in on the fledgling industry.

"This is wonderful news for Nevada that creates a huge opportunity for our economy," said U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nevada.

U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat, called the announcement a "slam dunk" for central and northern New York.

The competition for a test site was robust, Huerta said, as 25 entities in 24 states submitted proposals. At least one of the six sites chosen will be up and running within 180 days, while the others are expected to come online in quick succession, he said during a conference call with reporters.

The designations don't come with a financial award from the government.

While selecting the sites, the FAA considered geography, climate, ground infrastructure, research needs, airspace use, aviation experience and risk.

In choosing Alaska, the FAA cited a diverse set of test site locations in seven climatic zones. New York's site at Griffiss International Airport will look into integrating drones into the congested northeast airspace.

Nevada offered proximity to military aircraft from several bases.

Tests will determine whether drones can detect and avoid obstacles -- including other aircraft -- and whether they can operate safety when they lose contact with their operators.

"These test sites will give us valuable information about how best to ensure the safe introduction of this advanced technology into our nation's skies," Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in a statement.

An industry-commissioned study has predicted more than 70,000 jobs would develop in the first three years after Congress loosens drone restrictions on U.S. skies. The same study projects an average salary range for a drone pilot between $85,000 and $115,000.

North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven said the designation positions his state as a northern hub for unmanned systems and should attract students, researchers and aerospace technology companies.

The drone industry has critics among conservatives and liberals.

Giving drones greater access to U.S. skies moves the nation closer to "a surveillance society in which our every move is monitored, tracked, recorded and scrutinized by the authorities," the American Civil Liberties Union declared in a report last December.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., introduced a bill that would prohibit drones from checking for criminal or regulatory violations without a warrant.

"I just don't like the concept of drones flying over barbecues in New York to see whether you have a Big Gulp in your backyard or whether you are separating out your recyclables according to the city mandates," Paul said in an interview, referring to a New York City ban on supersized soft drinks.

Huerta said his agency is sensitive to privacy concerns involving drones. Test sites must have a written plan for data use and retention and will be required to conduct an annual review of privacy practices that involves public comment.

Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service