Aquatic center: No

August 4, 2013 

Aquatic center: No

The aquatic park is a bad investment of tax dollars. If I remember correctly, this park will be near Interstate 182, where Pasco had acquired two irrigation circles in the Potato Hill area. The proponents are intentionally not saying that there are not enough people to support this park. Look at Kennewick. It had an aquatic park and it has been gone for quite some time because of too little participation.

This tax that is being asked for on the ballot needs to be rejected. With the amount of tax that is being asked for is insufficient. They will need to keep it running. If you think that is bad, TRAC is still swimming in red ink. Not as much as it was, but it is still in red ink.

LLOYD BECKER, Richland

Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service