Letter: Arlene's Flowers -- What about the owner's rights?

June 23, 2013 

If I owned a flower shop like Arlene's, I also would serve all customers who came into my store regardless of their life's philosophies.

However, if a customer asked me to do something inside or outside my store that violated my moral standards, I too would politely refuse, as is my right of free choice and conscience under the Constitution. Why should owning a store change all that?

In past times, although the customer might get angry, they would blow off a little steam and go to someone else who agreed with their philosophy to get what they wanted -- ending the problem.

In present times, the so-called offended person now has to act like a juvenile and get even by initiating a lawsuit in order to make the owner, who is just trying to live according to her conscience and make an honest living, pay and be miserable.

Talk about fairness -- what about fairness to the owner's rights? Is not that important? Why put the owner into a difficult situation because you feel hurt, throw a tantrum and demand she think like you think?

Most thinking, fair and reasonable people would just walk away and go somewhere else.


Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service