Letter: Gun control proposals and gay marriage seem connected

May 10, 2013 

I am a bit confused as to the merit of forcing a florist to sell to gays -- less than 3 percent of the population who do not represent the average -- when they can easily achieve the goal of wedding decoration elsewhere.

I compare this to U.S. Rep. Nancy Pelosi's idea of depriving guns to some 97 percent of the population supposedly for self-protection. Something amiss?

Both operations seem to be connected to vast sums of money for either political advantage or ego control of the population. I've always assumed lawyers were men sent to protect us from legal theft. Am I wrong? Nowadays, some lawyers seem determined to support not the Constitution but a chaotic brand of random favoritism in some of the lawmaking.

Should we not reconsider the problems in light of the Ten Commandments?


Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service