Letter: Duportail bridge should be low priority for Richland

March 8, 2013 

The city of Richland is again entertaining the idea that we need a duplicate bridge at the end of Duportail Street. Why can't we spend the money on other much needed city projects (pothole repair, extra police or fire staff, develop nature paths, add sidewalks, improve snow removal or some of the hundreds of ideas that are underfunded?

We already have a functional bridge to the Queensgate area less than one-half mile from the Duportail project. Why else would they need to disrupt whole, established neighborhoods for a duplicate boondoggle?

Obviously, we don't have surplus funds or the huge utility rate increase would not have been necessary. We can't agree to spend money we just don't have.


Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service