Letter: How does easy access to assault-style rifles improve quality of American lives?

February 19, 2013 

Constitutional rights and firearms are again hot topics since the killing of 20 first-graders in Connecticut with an assault rifle. Predictably, the NRA quickly asserted, once again, that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to own such weapons. In truth, the Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms but does not stipulate which kinds. The federal government can, and does, restrict ownership of certain weapons, as reflected in National Firearms Act of 1968.

Congress made judgments about which types of weapons to restrict, such as fully automatic machine guns. They could have made different judgments. The constitutional right to own military-style assault weapons is exactly the same as the constitutional right to own grenades, stinger missiles and mortars. There is none.

This country suffers many times the per-capita homicide rate involving guns compared to almost every other nation. For instance, our gunfire-homicide rate is 7 times that of Canada, a nation with a strong hunting culture but sensible gun laws. Those who support easy access to assault rifles should explain how such access improves the quality of our lives.

DOUG BROWN, Kennewick

Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service