Letter: Reader plans to vote no on aquatic center because performing arts center preferred

January 30, 2013 

If the proposed aquatic center gets on the ballot, I will vote no.

I suspect there are not nearly as many people who need an indoor pool so they can swim all winter (I know, the proposal is for more than that) as there are people who would patronize a performing arts center.

I don't know the year-round swimmers, but I do know many concert patrons. The Convention Center and the Toyota arena are not satisfactory venues for performing arts.



Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service