Letter: Vista Field study points to airport's closure as best option

January 29, 2013 

The Vista Field study makes it pretty clear: The alternatives are to spend a lot of money hoping to develop an "aerotropolis" and lose more money each year running it, or spend a lot less money closing the airfield and making the land ready for millions in economic activity and new tax revenue through redevelopment.

If the two options were close, I'd be pushing the Port of Kennewick to hold an election and let the voters decide. It isn't close. The port commissioners were elected to be good stewards of the taxpayers' money. They should vote once-and-for-all to close the airfield and get about the business of developing the entertainment, retail and professional center of the new century.


Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service