Battery study questioned

December 12, 2012 


I'm intrigued about the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory getting $15 million to study battery technology. I know the Navy has studied battery technology for almost 100 years. The old O-boat lead/acid battery drawings were quite detailed.

The lead/acid on board the submarine I served on 40 years ago were much more robust than previous classes. I remember working as an undergraduate research assistant/technician in the chemical engineering department at Brigham Young University about 30 years ago studying new battery technology with the doctoral candidates. One of the projects had to do with a lithium/lithium perchlorate interface high energy battery. The explosions in the inert-atmosphere containment box were very energetic.

It seems to me that battery technology has really been studied to death. I wonder if we are just dumping more tax dollars down another rat hole.

Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service