Fast Focus: Make votes meaningful

November 18, 2012 


My vote for president a week ago was virtually useless. The same is true for most of us except those to live in the nine or ten states that were in play. So, should the Electoral College be eliminated? In a word, no. A much better way would be to have each state apportion the vote, based on who wins each congressional district. Nebraska and Maine already do something like this. Maintaining the Electoral College also protects the interests of small-population states. The other two votes (each state has two senators) could be assigned based on which candidate wins the most congressional districts or by popular vote count for the whole state.

The Washington State Legislature should take a serious look at this before 2016. This would certainly make voting more meaningful for most of us and force the politicians to stop bombarding places like Ohio and Florida.

Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service