Fast Focus: College prevents domination

November 18, 2012 

-- ALAN J. TINDELL, Richland

The Electoral College is absolutely essential to ensure that candidates for the presidency run as national candidates. Without it, we risk the possibility that multiple candidates would run, divide the vote several ways and a strictly regional candidate could win with a decided minority of the vote. Bill Clinton did not win more than 50 percent of the vote in either 1992 or 1996 because Ross Perot ran as a third party candidate and siphoned off some of the vote, although he didn't win any electoral votes. Despite polling less than half the popular vote Clinton still won convincingly in the Electoral College. But what if say half a dozen prominent, serious candidates ran as independents and the split the vote relatively equally? A person could be elected president with as little as 17 percent of the popular vote. The Electoral College ensures that no one can ever win the presidency with such a minority vote. The Electoral College also ensures that the large states such as California, New York, Illinois, Texas and Florida will not dominate the smaller states.

Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service