Pot law flawed

November 16, 2012 

GAIL EVERETT, Kennewick

I am so confused. The voters approved legalizing marijuana to earn more money for education, police and a few other lucky sources, but won't the extra revenue be needed to develop, educate and enforce the new pot program?

If pot can be purchased cheaper on the street or grown at home, doesn't this decrease that potential pot of gold? What about the revenue lost by excusing the hundreds of pending drug cases? Maybe we'll make up for lost revenue by taxes received from indoor growing and smoking paraphernalia shops that are springing up everywhere, and just think of the extra revenue coming from "pot tourism."

As I see it, the cost to government, police and social programs will skyrocket. The social costs to families and children and the mental and physical health costs (including those to developing fetuses) will be indescribable.

I believe we have just taken another step toward our own, self-induced apocalypse and Washington is leading the way.

Approving recreational use of an illegal drug is opening the door for more abuse, neglect and social problems. We need to understand, our future is not based on what is good for "me" but what is best for "we."

Tri-City Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service