Legislatures big and small and legislators big and small have one thing in common: They like to make themselves look good at as cheap a price as possible.
In Washington and elsewhere, that translates into a willingness to authorize programs that all agree are necessary and beneficial, but a reluctance to pay for them.
There's nothing cheaper than to demand service without paying for it.
This always hurts, but it is particularly difficult when children's interests and education are at stake.
And so it is with prekindergarteners in many states, including Washington.
According to The Associated Press, states are cutting hundreds of millions of dollars from their prekindergarten budgets.
It undermines years of helping children -- particularly poor ones -- get ready for school.
More than a third of a billion dollars is being cut nationwide, despite a lot of lip service from lawmakers.
In Washington, for example, the Legislature recently expanded (in its usual hollow fashion) the state's prekindergarten program from 8,000 needy kids to more than 45,000 by 2018.
Then the legislature cut $1.6 million from the program last fiscal year and another $10.4 million this year.
It's stupefying to see how crafty our legislators have become. The current economic troubles didn't just burst upon the scene. Even as they were voting to expand prekindergarten education, lawmakers knew they couldn't pay for it.
Nationally, the worst isn't over. It's anticipated that more cuts will come when federal stimulus money dries up.
According to the National Institute for Early Education Research at Rutgers University, "Preschool-age children across the nation will feel a much bigger impact from the recession in 2010 and 2011 than in the past. ...
"We estimate that so far, $348 million in state funding has been cut from state-funded pre-K programs across those two years and that figure could well rise," said Institute co-director Steve Barnett.
He said $248.3 million was cut from 16 state prekindergarten initiatives in fiscal year 2010 alone, with another $99.8 million in funding cuts proposed in 2011. Barnett says if the pattern for 2010 is any indication, that figure could rise by year-end.
"Even as we move out of the Great Recession, state revenues will continue to lag the recovery. Our elected officials must prioritize public investments that are pro-growth -- as cuts will cost us and our children far more in the future than they save today," Barnett said.
He is right, of course.
Whether it's called lip service, cynicism, gulling the citizenry, flat-out political misrepresentation or worse, legislators must recognize their duty to solve problems, not shuffle them aside as the members posture to get re-elected, then duck the cameras when it's time to pay for the promises.
Modern studies show that money spent on preventive and educational programs is far more effective than what's spent to clean up after social failures.
It's strange that most of the people running for office this year -- including here in the Tri-Cities -- campaign on cleaning up waste in government and cutting taxes.
Few have anything positive to say on what they'd like to do for the youngsters.
EDITOR'S NOTE: This editorial on budget cuts for prekindergarten education programs inadvertently repeated an error that appeared in an Associated Press article on the subject.
The Legislature cut the states Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program by $193,000 this year. The larger figure cited in the article and editorial was proposed by Gov. Chris Gregoire but never enacted.
Similar stories:
Olympia 2012: Many claim education funding not adequate
Olympia 2012: Many claim education funding not adequate
OLYMPIA -- A bill that requires the state to pass the K-12 education budget before all other budgets found support at a House committee hearing this week, but educators and parents worry the state does not have enough money to adequately fund education.
House Bill 2533, also called Fund Education First, tells lawmakers when to discuss education funding, not how -- or how much -- to fund education.
Rep. Larry Haler, R-Richland, told the Herald that he supports the bill, and education must be better funded at the state level.
Washington state budget debate to begin
Washington state budget debate to begin
Talking about a $2 billion deficit in Washington can seem unreal -- it's a number almost too big for the average person to imagine, but one that might have very real consequences for thousands of Tri-Citians.
And it's the number that will be the focus of lawmakers' discussion and debate as the Legislature convenes in a 30-day special session Monday to tackle that deficit before it ordinarily would meet to write a supplemental budget starting in January.
The actual shortfall between projected revenue and the biennial budget as written is about $1.4 billion, but Gov. Chris Gregoire is asking lawmakers to cut enough to leave $600 million in reserves.
Washington state budget debate to begin
Washington state budget debate to begin
Talking about a $2 billion deficit in Washington can seem unreal -- it's a number almost too big for the average person to imagine, but one that might have very real consequences for thousands of Tri-Citians.
And it's the number that will be the focus of lawmakers' discussion and debate as the Legislature convenes in a 30-day special session Monday to tackle that deficit before it ordinarily would meet to write a supplemental budget starting in January.
The actual shortfall between projected revenue and the biennial budget as written is about $1.4 billion, but Gov. Chris Gregoire is asking lawmakers to cut enough to leave $600 million in reserves.
Legislature should review higher education, government pay
Legislature should review higher education, government pay
Washington's college and university presidents traditionally have been among the highest paid employees in the state, the thought being they raise millions for their schools, so paying them well is worth it.
Nobody is arguing they don't deserve a substantial salary, but in this current, dismal economic climate, the Legislature ought to take a second look at just how much university presidents are making -- especially since students this year are facing significant tuition increases at the same time colleges are cutting programs and staff.
The Office of Financial Management recently released a report on the gross pay state employees earned in 2010. It revealed a significant gap between higher education officials and other state employees.
Wulff's costly departure raises issues of priorities
Wulff's costly departure raises issues of priorities
When officials from Washington's universities and colleges are pressing state lawmakers to look elsewhere for budget cuts, we're pretty sure the athletic directors won't be leading the charge.
Scrutiny of college athletic programs -- at Washington State University and the University of Washington, at least -- can only detract from the narrative.
Here's the story our friends in Pullman want legislators to be thinking about -- the state has already cut funding for Washington State University by 60 percent over the last four years.