While serious martial arts movies have their place -- at least people are getting hurt, and that's what's really important -- I'm a sucker for the funny ones.
Violence and comedy go together like chocolate and peanut butter that's been secretly replaced with even more delicious chocolate.
Watching someone get dispatched with an inventive wallop is the ultimate form of "it's funny because it's not me," like when your friend crashes his new car into his winning lotto ticket.
Comic but beautiful, 2003's Ong-bak is a case study in seeing people get hit in ways you'll pray you never have to experience firsthand.
After the head of a sacred Buddhist statue is stolen from a village in Thailand, resident Tony Jaa travels into gangland Bangkok to get it back. But Jaa is no ordinary bumpkin: he's a master of muay boxing, and when he hits the big city, it's the city that gets knocked out.
Sound like hyperbole? Perhaps, but when Jaa kicks some guy across his face it sounds like late-era Orson Welles doing a bellyflop onto the sidewalk. So you think you've seen muay boxing on UFC, have you? All you've seen is gangly-legged wimps throwing Goldilocks roundhouses at other wimps! And if Anderson Silva reads this and decides to pulverize some sense into me, I can only assume he'll have to get through Jaa first, whose farming-village honor inspires even hardened con men to help him in his quest.
Ong-bak's fighting and choreography are incredible, all the more so because director Prachya Pinkaew made it without any CG or wirework. As a result, its physics look painfully real -- Jaa strikes with such fierce and sudden force I'm surprised the entire country of Thailand wasn't kicked bodily into Laos.
But it's got more to offer than the innocent joy of watching one man crack another man's head with a flying elbow drop. With a delightful and athletic sense of humor that wouldn't feel out of place in a Jackie Chan movie, Pinkaew's action scenes are as funny for us as they are painful for the participants.
And in case you miss any
of them on the first take, he graciously repeats that vicious front-kick or taxi explosion from one or two different angles, just to be safe. While its story is nothing new, Ong-bak is a movie of bone-cracking fights, ridiculous hairstyles, and awe-inspiring gladiating that makes the most of every moment it's got.
-- Contact Ed Robertson at edwrobertson@gmail.com.
Similar stories:
Big Awful Friday: 'Super' heroically off-kilter
Big Awful Friday: 'Super' heroically off-kilter
People are constantly surprised that no one has ever tried to be a superhero in real life, but you have to realize superheroes don't get paid.
That is why I say it's time for the government to admit we're screwed and blow the budget on funding vigilante crimefighters instead.
We might all starve, but the newspapers we wear for warmth will have some great headlines. It's a good thing we will all be laughing because that will be our new health insurance. What, you don't think street beatdowns of felons can be funny? Then you haven't seen 2010's Super .
2011's best, worst and a few observations on 20 years as a film critic
2011's best, worst and a few observations on 20 years as a film critic
First some observations: If you're just interested in my best and worst of the year picks, scroll down. They're easy to find.
Two remarkable things about 2011.
No. 1: As I write this, I am wrapping up 20 years as the Tri-City Herald's film critic. No. 2: Last year I cried at a movie. Actually, I cry at a lot of movies but for a much different reason than you suspect. But more on that in a bit.
Mr. Movie's list of Halloween favorites
Mr. Movie's list of Halloween favorites
I’m going to ramble a bit. Normally when picking a best list you do five or 10. I’m doing six. It just worked out that way.
When you look at my picks you will note I deliberately left The Exorcist off my list. While some think it’s the best horror film of them all, I read the book and it pales in comparison. Other than Linda Blair’s spinning head, lots profanity and vomit, and Mercedes McCambridge’s brilliant work as the dubbed-in demon voice, there isn’t much substance.
I guess at this point you’ve guessed the topic of this post is horror movies for Halloween. You’ll want to get started early. These days they get gobbled up at the few video stores that are left. I know next to nothing about Netflix so I’m not sure what kind of a supply it has for those still doing the mail thing.
'Jack and Jill' all downhill
'Jack and Jill' all downhill
Fart jokes at age 45?
Adam Sandler is still doing them and usually within five minutes of the beginning of a movie. Hard to believe isn’t it? And he doesn’t stick with just one. Sandler’s form of “humor” can be found twice, thrice, sometimes even four times in a film.
Prepubescent boys find a toot a hoot. By the time you’re 15, fart jokes are pretty much passe. Maybe it’s Sandler’s signature. Modern comedians tend not to use them. Billy Crystal is one of the few. He’s simply marvelous. A lot of old-time comedians did. Jimmy Durante said goodnight to Mrs. Calabash. Bill Cosby’s signature is, “Hey, hey, hey.” George Burns told his lovely bride to, “Say goodnight, Gracie.”
'30 Minutes or Less' a mirthless comedy
'30 Minutes or Less' a mirthless comedy
Basing a goofy crime comedy on a real-life case full of horrific violence: great idea or greatest idea?
I've got a feeling audiences will go crazy for this romantic comedy I'm working on about the BTK strangler finding love after unwittingly kidnapping the woman of his dreams. If that one fails, I'm looking into a can't-miss sequel tentatively titled Look Who's Talking: Dear Zachary .
The writers of 30 Minutes or Less claim they were just vaguely aware of the real-life event their movie's plot is almost exactly identical to, right down to the motivations spurring the crime. But even if they're not guilty of theft, they're guilty of a far worse crime: making a comedy that isn't any damn funny.