John from Seattle read the recent Seattle Times story breaking down positions held by Gov. Chris Gregoire and Republican challenger Dino Rossi on an array of social issues.
In that story, Rossi stated he isnt running abortion or gay marriage issues (he opposes both, though would allow abortions in case of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother).
In addressing Rossis statement that hes not running on those issues, John asks the following:
What does the phrase really mean? Is it just a maneuver or is it possible Rossi would try to duck those issues as governor? Whether or not he's running on an issue, won't he have to deal with it once in office (if elected)?
We are to understand that Rossi is not making either issue a central theme of his campaign or a primary component of his platform. And if elected, given that and his general evasiveness on such issues, it would be quite notable should he press for legislation addressing either one of them.
But that doesnt mean questions about his positions on them arent fair game. For starters, it would seem quite likely that the next governor will see a gay marriage bill land on their desk. And theyll have to act on it one way or the other. So any question about a position on gay marriage is very much in play.
As Rossi said in the story, abortion is another matter. Its something both parties have largely steered clear of and arent particularly eager to take up.
Nonetheless, such questions about any candidates position on abortion is fair game for one simple reason: Voters want to know. Ive been told before that legislative candidates shouldnt have to face questions about abortion because its not an issue theyd be likely to vote on if elected.
That may be true. But there are a lot of one-issue voters out there, for better or worse. And they want to know.
Thanks for the question.
For more Olympia Dispatch see www.olympiadispatch.com
Stay updated with the Olympia Dispatch RSS feed:
http://www.tri-cityherald.com/944/v-highlights/index.rss
Similar stories:
Gay marriage supporters say they're seeing gains
Gay marriage supporters say they're seeing gains
With momentum building in several states to give same-sex couples the right to marry, and with legislators and voters alike rallying to their side, supporters of gay marriage feel good about 2012. But along with gains, there could be setbacks, and it's far from clear how the issue will play in a presidential election year.
Romney intensifies fight for social conservatives
Romney intensifies fight for social conservatives
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney shifted his focus from the economy to abortion, religious freedom and gay marriage in recent days, part of an intensified effort to win over social conservatives in states voting Tuesday.
Candidate Dunn roils GOP
Candidate Dunn roils GOP
Republican attorney-general candidate Reagan Dunn is facing a backlash from some GOP leaders and activists about his decision to come out in support of gay marriage.
In the past week, Dunn has been disinvited to big Republican dinners in Franklin and Whatcom counties, and faces a new conservative rival in the attorney-general's race.
"That's the name of the game. There has been some blow back," said Dunn, a Metropolitan King County Council member.
Ballot challenge certain for WA gay marriage bill
Ballot challenge certain for WA gay marriage bill
Washington state is likely to become the seventh state to legalize same-sex within the next two weeks, but opponents have already promised a ballot challenge would halt any summertime weddings.
Government's imperative
Government's imperative
Again, our "beloved" Gov. Chris Gregoire shows her ignorance by supporting gay marriage. The reality is that it is not discriminatory to deny homosexuals the right to legally marry. With respect to marriage, homosexuals are afforded exactly the same right as heterosexuals. Both homosexuals and heterosexuals can marry one unmarried adult person of the opposite sex who is not a close blood relative.
Those rules may disappoint the incestuous, pedophiles, polygamists, bigamists and homosexuals, but the issue is not discrimination. It is the basic issue of marriage itself. Gay marriage would not simply "expand marriage," it would completely redefine it. Marriage is about a lot more than just "loving relationships." It is primarily about the perpetuation of the human family, and providing the best possible environment to raise children.
For many generations, governments and societies have granted institutional benefits and privileges only to traditional marriage because only these unions have the biological
Print
Email Story
