Kennewick Man Virual Interpretive CenterKennewick Man Virual Interpretive Center
reprint or license print story Print email this story to a friend E-Mail
Bookmark and Share

tool name

close
tool goes here

Friday, Oct. 01, 2004

Comments (0)

Scientists protest Kennewick Man bill

WASHINGTON - Scientists hoping to study the ancient skeleton known as Kennewick Man are protesting a bill by Colorado Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell which they say could block their efforts.

A two-word amendment would change an Indian graves-protection law to allow federally recognized tribes to claim ancient remains even if they cannot prove a link to a current tribe.

Scientists say the bill, if enacted, could have the effect of overturning a federal appeals court ruling that allowed them to study the 9,300-year-old bones.

The skeleton was discovered in 1996 along the Columbia River near Kennewick, Wash., and has been the focus of a bitter eight-year fight.

Four Northwest tribes claimed they were entitled to the bones under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, or NAGPRA. The tribes wanted to have the bones reburied without any scientific studies.

The tribes - the Umatilla, Yakama, Nez Perce and Colville - dropped their court fight this summer after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that no direct link exists between them and the skeleton.

But scientists said Thursday that the bill introduced by Campbell would, in effect, nullify the appeals court ruling.

"It's a real sneaky way to amend" the Indian graves law, said Alan Schneider, an attorney for the scientists.

Campbell, a Republican and a member of the Northern Cheyenne tribe, chairs the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, which approved the bill this week.

A spokesman for the panel declined to comment Thursday.

Schneider and an advocacy group known as Friends of America's Past said they were concerned the bill would go to the full Senate as a routine "housekeeping" measure and be approved with little or no debate.

"Basically all ancient skeletons would be subject to NAGPRA, and under the tribes' interpretation, you couldn't study them," Schneider said.

But an attorney for one of the tribes called the criticism off base.

Even if the bill is enacted - a longshot at best, given Congressional leaders' intent to adjourn in early October - it is not clear that it would apply to Kennewick Man, said Rob Roy Smith, an attorney for the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation.

"I'm not sure if it would have any retroactive effect," Smith said.

Still, Smith said Northwest tribes applaud Campbell's efforts, because the bill returns to Congress's intent in adopting the 1990 graves protection law.

The change would add the words "or was" to a definitional section of the law. The change is intended to clarify that in the context of ancient remains, the term "Native American" refers to a member of a tribe, a people or a culture that is or was indigenous to the United States.

Supporters say the bill would strengthen the case of tribes trying to claim and bury ancient remains without having to prove a link to a current tribe.

"Something that is indigenous, such as tribes of the Northwest related to Kennewick Man, cannot lose indigenousness over time," Smith said.

Smith and others said the graves protection law was meant to be broader than has been interpreted by courts, including the 9th Circuit.

While supporters hope the bill will be approved this year, "if not I would hope someone else takes up Sen. Campbell's cause next year," Smith said. Campbell is retiring from the Senate at the end of the year.



Member Options